Other Sellers on Amazon
97% positive over last 12 months
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
John Adams [Blu-ray]
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Additional Blu-ray options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
Blu-ray
November 25, 2014 "Please retry" | — | — |
—
| — | — |
Watch Instantly with | Per Episode | Buy Season |
Purchase options and add-ons
Genre | Documentary, Drama, Historical |
Format | Widescreen, Subtitled, Blu-ray, DTS Surround Sound, Color |
Contributor | Kevin Trainor, David Morse, Justin Theroux, John Dossett, Paul Giamatti, Michael Hall D'Addario, Stephen Dillane, Andrew Scott, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Tom Wilkinson, Madeline Taylor, Laura Linney, Mamie Gummer, Rufus Sewell, Steven Hinkle, Dan Taylour, Danny Huston, Samuel Barnett, Tom Hooper, Sarah Polley See more |
Initial release date | 2009-06-16 |
Language | English |
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
- WASHINGTONJeff DanielsDVDFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
- The CrossingJeff DanielsDVDFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
- Sons Of Liberty [Blu-ray + Digital HD]Mardi RustamBlu-rayFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
- Lincoln (Blu-ray+DVD)Daniel Day-LewisBlu-rayFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
- 1776 [Blu-ray]William DanielsBlu-rayFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
- Abraham Lincoln (2022) [DVD]Graham SibleyDVDFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
Product Description
While our new nation was suffering attacks from both within and without, John Adams had a vision of a nation of liberty and justice for all. He guided his peers- General George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson- in setting values and agenda for a glorious, free America. Adams and his wife Abigail refined these ambitious democratic ideals, and their partnership became one of the most moving love stories in American history. John Adams, the Pulitzer Prize-winning book from David McCullough, is now the criticall acclaimed seven-part miniseries from HBO Films- a sprawling, epic production from executive producers Tom Hanks and Gary Goetzman, two of the men who brought you the Emmy-award winning Band of Brothers. Starring Academy Award nominees Paul Giamatti (Cinderella Man) and Laura Linney (The Savages) as John and Abigail Adams, directed by Emmy winner Tom Hooper (Elizabeth I) and adapted by Kirk Ellis and Michelle Ashford from McCullough’s book, John Adams is the incredible saga of a man who dreamed a nation and watched it come true.
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.78:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
- Product Dimensions : 7.25 x 5.75 x 1 inches; 9.92 ounces
- Item model number : 5075383
- Director : Tom Hooper
- Media Format : Widescreen, Subtitled, Blu-ray, DTS Surround Sound, Color
- Run time : 9 hours and 20 minutes
- Release date : June 16, 2009
- Actors : Paul Giamatti, Laura Linney, Stephen Dillane, John Dossett, Sarah Polley
- Dubbed: : Spanish
- Subtitles: : English, Spanish, French
- Language : English (DTS-HD High Res Audio), French (Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo), Spanish (Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo)
- Studio : HBO Studios
- ASIN : B001684L0A
- Country of Origin : USA
- Number of discs : 3
- Best Sellers Rank: #8,585 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,026 in Drama Blu-ray Discs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I was amazed at how well Paul did in his role... as did Linny. I had no idea he was this talented. He surprised me with his outstanding performance. Both were completely believable as if they were the original figures they portrayed and looked very close to the original couple as well. I almost did not recognize her without her blond hair.
I also wanted to make note of the excellent musical score. Normally, I don't mention this but this was a unique sound combination of Irish flair violin and military cadence... very enjoyable. I was extremely impressed by the musical score.
The movie also has a feature which brings up extensive historical notes throughout the entire film which you can opt to turn on. I recommend trying this on the second time you watch the film... it would ruin the movie if you do this on the first viewing.
I enjoyed it so much, I intend to watch it more than once. It was that fantastic. I was quite astounded to find the movie so intriguing. It was a quality production on the scale of high dollar epics such as "Hawaii." I can't say enough great things about it. I'm glad I didn't read any of the reviews prior to watching the movie. I'm not sure what movie these negative nellies were watching... but it wasn't the same movie I saw. I was completely immersed in the movie from the moment I turned it on until the final scene.
It was refreshing to see some of the historical events finally being shown in the spirit of how they really were instead of the sugar coated facades we have been fed most of our lives... such as the Boston Massacre. It was provoked by a huge mob of 200-400 throwing rocks and ice inside snowballs at the British sentries. The incident was used by the colonists as propaganda. Sam Adams was a true rabble rouser just as depicted in the film. He was the biggest ringleader in the break from Britain with his drunken mob, "The sons of Liberty" who pulled all kinds of nasty deeds to drive out the British and start the revolution with England. (Tarring and feathering were indeed some of their deeds). While they were indeed the main catalyst behind the break from Britain... they weren't the fine, respectable gentlemen history had shown them to be.
This movie shows them more accurately for the tavern mobs and street gangs they truly were. But depicting them as they were realistically, does not diminish the fact that it often takes a mob mentality to find the gumption to fight improprieties and crimes against liberties. Those with no hope, often don't have the strength to fight back as we've seen in slavery. But to show history other than it was is a disservice to us all. This movie brings back that reality to our history.
For John Adams to have defended the hated British sentries so successfully after the shootings, in front of a Boston jury of colonists, is a tribute to his skills as an attorney and evidence of how badly this mob of colonists behaved.
However, the depiction of the unbridled display of public ranting in the courtroom was totally unnecessary and I doubt accurate. I don't think any court... especially one still under the rules of the British, would have tolerated a rowdy public exhibition of the colonists in a courtroom. It almost ruined the viewing experience. Reminded me of the Trial by Q on Star Trek TNG Farpoint. Very irritating.
No court would not have allowed the witnesses or accused to have been pressed in on and their testimonies intimidated and threatened by ranting, nasty crowds. However, Sam Adams was indeed, every bit the hothead he was shown to be in this film.
While it is true that 2 of the soldiers were actually found guilty of manslaughter (which was not depicted in the film)... their only punishment was to have their thumbs branded. Fortunately for the British sentries, one of the slain members of the mob provided a death bed statement as to the actual events which helped defend the actions of the guards. It wasn't the huge issue some reviewers made of the differences. You can read about this trial and incident online. [...]
I was a little puzzled by the film first showing the Adam's to be living in town... and then showing them to be living on a farm outside of town. It is my understanding that they always lived on a farm but the massacre did take place within view of Mrs Adams. But the two houses were a bit confusing unless they had 2 homes at the same time?
On the minor negatives, the one thing that was distracting to me was seeing Paul Giamatti's shaved bald head in the early scenes each time he came into the house and took off his wig. Colonial men did not shave their heads. They wore their hair long. So, every time they showed him pulling off his wig with the shaved head, it totally ruined those scenes for me because it broke the mood of the character and became an irritant. It was like having the actor take off their makeup during the scene. They need to keep the actor in character... not transpose 21st century hairstyles. Fortunately, they stopped doing this after the first DVD. Why go to the trouble to be historically accurate and then do something like this?
The scene of cutting off his daughter's breast was totally unnecessary and uncalled for. There was no reason to subject the audience to that kind of thing... it is as bad as showing literal amputations. We don't need to see things like that. The film can make the issue known without showing us a gory graphic depiction of it. How would they like to see a graphic castration? This scene was mortifying and I would hate to think any child might be subjected to that. It was bad enough for adults. This was a VERY BAD lack of judgment on the directors part... and the producer who should have been keeping track of what the director was doing.
Again, there was no need to horrify the audience. This film should have been a family docu-drama... and still can be with elimination of a couple of those unnecessary scenes.
The other scene which was a negative issue was the tar & feather scene. Most people who watch a historical docu-drama are not expecting full frontal nudity for one with half exposure of the genitals... 97% nudity at least... especially if they are showing this to their family. It was also quite brutal, too literal and far too much time spent on it. It could have been depicted without forcing the audience to endure the full ordeal. While it may be authentic... it was not necessary.
We also did not need to see the graphic depiction of the pox vaccinations and the daughter's ordeal. It is ok to include it but the level of graphic details were not needed. It was really quite disturbing. Accuracy does not always required graphic display. For instance, we do not need to see the contents of the bucket to know that someone has thrown up. The sound alone is more than enough to indicate the same.
I also agree that they should have shown more about the political mudslinging with Jefferson and Hamilton and more about the animosity that was occurring at the time he lost his bid for re-election. It was a major issue of the rift between them. There were also too many do-nothing scenes of Adams sitting in the gutted white house and not enough of Adams interactions with politics and politicians. They really showed nothing of him being president.
Having lived in France during the 66 Exodus of Americans, it was refreshing to finally see the behaviors and attitudes of the French being portrayed more true to life on a film and Adam's reaction to them. The reason this is important is because it helps to understand why there has always been such bitterness between the French and British and Americans. In fact, there were things a lot worse than was shown on the film... from hygiene, to attire and behaviors I have witnessed in person, which are so bad I cannot repeat them on here. I can only imagine what our diplomats encountered 200 years earlier. (Tourists don't see these things. If you haven't lived in the older, unmodernized sectors of the country... you don't know the these aspects).
While Benjamin Franklin was amazing on a lot of things... there was a dark side to him which was not that pretty for history or public consumption. It was refreshing to see this other side of him for a change. I had read about Ben Franklin's lewd habits from many sources... especially his escapades in France. He spent nearly all of his life overseas and almost none in the colonies until after the Constitution. While he was quick of wit, funny and brilliant... he was also a shameless, lazy lothario who spent all of his time partying with ladies from the brothels and had no use or time for his wife or family. Fans of Franklin's don't like to hear about his darker nature... but that's how he truly was by his own admission whether his fans like it or not. Celebrities are not perfect and some have very bad sides as was the case with Benjamin Franklin. He was admittedly a dirty old man, self indulgent who completely ignored his own family and children. He was lazy and irresponsible and admitted to spending most of his time fornicating with the lowest and nastiest of street women as depicted in this movie instead of doing the job he was sent there to do. His behavior was shameless and many lives were lost while he partied to satiate his own debaucheries.
There is an excellent DVD of Franklin's life in the history channel set "The founding of America" showing a lot of Franklin's true behavior... but this Adam's miniseries did an excellent job showing Franklin's (rarely exhibited) caustic personality and reactions at having his shameless, x-rated cavorting disrupted. He used his popularity as a weapon of power and usually kept this dark side hidden from public. He reveled and garnered public adoration by using wit, humorous anecdotes and quips in his publications. He also enjoyed amazing the uneducated masses with sideshow tricks already known by scientists of that era... but which awestruck the commoners whom had never seen such things. Static generators had long since been developed before his kite experiment but his stunt made it appear to the masses he was the first to deal with such things. It was all presentation for the attention he so readily craved.
He enjoyed having his ego stoked & fed with clamoring crowds of admirers. The people of France treated him like they did Jackie Kennedy... as a celebrity. They had his face printed on all kinds of souvenirs and gadgets. Franklin's face was on so many things that the King of France had a bedpan made with Franklin's face... which should give you an idea how Franklin's personal pursuit of celebrity attention for his own pleasure had actually damaged the King's impression of the colonists and caused him to look down upon us. Thus, Franklin was not doing the job so desperately needed by our soldiers and Gen Washington... but the colonial congress was full of egocentric dandies who weren't any better than Franklin... and weren't any more interested in holding up their promises to the troops either. They all thought Franklin was great fun, thus Franklin was never reprimanded. He had free reign to indulge his indiscretions without oversight.
To get even more attention, Franklin even took to wearing coonskin hats... something he never did anywhere other than France. The ladies even designed their hairstyles over his hats. He liked being the center of attention to bring him endless ladies and parties.
Adams wanted to get down to business and talk details of supplies and support for the colonial troops. But Franklin didn't want Adams to screw up his own egomaniacal celebrity status in France which brought him endless droves of ladies, parties and personal attention to stroke his ego. Franklin spent years in France partying with the ladies instead of doing his job to get funding, weapons and military support for our troops. Sure, he finally got it... After we won a decisive battle and they did turn the tide at the end... but how many soldiers died in the interim so that Franklin could enjoy his years of brothel lifestyle?
He didn't want Adam's rocking the boat for his personal entertainment. The depiction of the animosity on this film was excellent and the best rendition I have seen of the "real" Benjamin Franklin which the colonists never got to see. Franklin spent the first 70 years of his life in England and nearly a decade in France. Only the final years after the Constitution did he live in the US... after his wife died while he was cavorting in France.
While some reviewers made a big deal out of Adam's relationship with his son Charles... Franklin had the same with his own son and didn't speak to him. But the portrayal on this film was accurate to the historical info available from many other reference sources. However, Charles was one of those kids who never listened and was constantly getting into trouble. There are just some kids who are like this regardless of the parent. John Adams also raised a son who became President... so he had a son at each end of the spectrum... so that doesn't indicate the parent was bad. Often, the younger sons act out toward older brothers who they perceive as the parent's pet. You see this with royal families all the time. A lot of families with multiple boys usually has two opposite boys. Just look at Princes William and Harry. So for a reviewer to blame the father seems more like a personal issue. A broader view will show this is a common thing in larger families and especially in families of notoriety. But can also be due to parental or position related favoritism as well.
Congress sent Adams abroad to get rid of him. As a lawyer and an honest man, he was particular to details and honor and making good on promises. The Colonial Congress didn't support Washington's troops with the supplies, food, money and munitions they so desperately needed. As Adams stated... they just liked hearing themselves talk and thinking of themselves as important men. They were only interested in their own social standings and notoriety... much like Franklin, although in a different manner.
One other scene which was poorly done was the scene with King George. Very badly written and even worse portrayed by the actor. The way he stood there by the chair, you were questioning whether or not he was the King at all or whether he was a footman. This scene should have been completely redone. It was one of the few badly written, badly acted scenes in the entire movie.
Adams wasn't a "good ole boy" or one of the "social elite" so he didn't play along when the rest of the representatives who didn't keep their words or do their duty. He believed in being forthright, honest and responsible. Adams would have rocked the boat in the congress rather than let our troops suffer the way they did... so they sent Adam's to Europe to get rid of him. Unfortunately, being a man of integrity and honor bound to duty... he did what he was told. He should have just gotten on a boat and come back or refused. But being duty-bound, he allowed them to run him around without disputing it. The only way Congress would have done their jobs would have been by tossing it back in their laps. This movie did an excellent job showing the egotism, selfishness and petty bickering of our representatives of that era. Not so different from today. Unfortunately, Adam's didn't have the fortitude to speak out and stand up against them. He was a "loyal patriot" who did whatever they assigned him to.
However, it was also refreshing to see that realism of the petty bickering in Congress and the impotent group they truly were instead of the sugar coated facade we have been shown in school most of our lives. Like Adams said about the painting at the end... the image was a fraudulent depiction from how it truly was and our politicians have made sure history was redesigned to make them all look like gallant saviors. Adams & Jefferson did most of the work while the rest bickered and whined.
The behavior of the colonists depicted by this movie is indeed authentic... as was the behavior of John's hothead, rabble rousing, political agitator cousin, Sam Adams. The colonists did behave like lawless mobs. This movie did show a realistic depiction of how they really behaved at that time. In fact, most of them would get liquored up and stirred into a frenzy then go out into the streets looking for someone or something to transfer their rage against. Sam's "Sons of Liberty" were made up of the hotheaded drunkards who spent most of their time in the taverns. This is a historical fact whether or not people like it. It is unfortunate that some immature people create idyllic images in their minds which have no bearing on actual events whatsoever. Even worse are those efforts history has made to glorify or demonize various events in a manner which has no comparison with the truth... and then teach those falsehoods in our history lessons.
It was about time that someone did a realistic rendition of the true events and circumstances of our history. We need to see history as it truly was... not as we would like it to be.
An excellent film. I highly recommend it but I would advise extreme caution on the two or three scenes if you intend to allow your children to watch. You should locate and preview those scenes before you allow your children to watch... then you can skip past them when permitting your children to view the film so they won't be subjected to it.
Not only do I recommend the seller but the mini series as well. Educate yourself on the most interesting lives of those who wrote & signed our Declaration of Independence. Learn how & why it was created & about the first congress.
My friend who has read extensively about these men & their revolutionary time period, said it was true to all he had read. I’m sure there are artistic licenses taken for conversions, etc. that we would not be privy to, but the outcome of those conversions has been recorded.
You will learn, not only about the men, but the influential role that the First Lady played in the founding of our country. Of interesting & an ironic note, friends (& both became presidents), John Adams & Thomas Jefferson died on the anniversary of the founding of our country they worked tirelessly to create, within hours of each other. July 4, 1826. You also see how John Adams son, John Quincey Adams was prepared to become president as well.
It’s a wonderful story that everyone should watch..
Now as for the Blu-ray version I have owned this since 2014 I just wish they would have at least released a 4K version as I would also purchase it in that format as well.
Not sure if any streaming service may show this mini series but if they do,. please by all means watch it. You will certainly enjoy the show. And if you enjoy it that much make sure to purchase your copy. As the price has pretty much stayed very near the same after all these years as of todays date. But I'm sure that could change at anytime.
Reviewed in the United States on January 14, 2024
Now as for the Blu-ray version I have owned this since 2014 I just wish they would have at least released a 4K version as I would also purchase it in that format as well.
Not sure if any streaming service may show this mini series but if they do,. please by all means watch it. You will certainly enjoy the show. And if you enjoy it that much make sure to purchase your copy. As the price has pretty much stayed very near the same after all these years as of todays date. But I'm sure that could change at anytime.
Top reviews from other countries
N'ai pas encore eu le temps de visionner les 3 galettes, mais les épisodes vus à la télévision m'ont incité à en savoir encore un peu plus sur cet avocat, acteur de la révolution américaine; un des pères fondateurs des Etats-Unis d'Amérique, dont il sera le premier vice-président (à l'époque de notre révolution française) sous la présidence de George Washington et ensuite le premier locataire de la Maison Blanche en 1800.
Hollywood - Historienkino wird vermieden. Georg Washington z.B. erscheint nicht als die Übervaterfigur, wie sie von seinen Zeitgenossen wahrgenommen und beschrieben wurde.
Ebenso verzichtet der Film auf Pathos wie er in Filmen wie Der Patriot oder Serien wie Fackeln im Sturm zu sehen ist.
Um dies zu erzählen, haben die Macher einen langsamen Erzählstil gewählt. Zwar wird die bei HBO übliche Handkamera eingesetzt, aber nicht, um Hektik und Geschwindigkeit zu transportien, sondern um den Zuschauer sich als Beobachter zu fühlen.
Als besonders schön finde ich auch, dass auf schnelle Schnitte verzichtet wurde.
John Adams erinnert mich an die europäischen Historien-TV- Serien, die ich als Kind in den 80er Jahren geschaut habe. (Wallenstein / Richelieu). Wer diese mochte, der wird auch John Adams mögen.
Despite this not being as big or popular as Band of Brothers here in the UK this series is just as unmissable. Paul Giamatti puts in a phenomenal performance as the 2nd President of the United States of America. Starting in the years preceding the wars of independence as a Boston Lawyer, John Adams rises to become one of the leaders of the American revolution alongside General George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc. Also look out for Tom Wilkinson who is excellent as Ben Franklin.
The story focuses mainly on Adams' part in the revolution so we don't see much of the wars going on as Adams was in France at the time. Throughout the series though we see Adams' viewpoint at the turning of a new era for America. From the years preceding the revolution to Washington's presidency (& Adamas vice-presidency), Adams' own presidency, Jefferson's presidency, & Adams's retirement. The series concludes with the 50th anniversary of the independence and a poignant moment for Adams as he comes to realise that he & Jefferson are the last of the revolutionaries alive & the two former rivals become friends.
There are some touching moments along the way. Two of Adams' children die before him, so does his beloved wife Abigail (an equally excellent Laura Linney) in the final part. The main cast play the roles excellent & despite a large timescale (around 50+ years) it remains convincing as they are aged so well by the make up department!
The production is top notch as expected with a HBO mini-series. Sets, costumes & characters all look exactly as they should. The blu-ray set (which is REGION-FREE) is almost demo quality. Detail is a massive upgrade from the DVD. Both the DVD & blu-ray also include an optional historical text ("facts are stubborn things") which helps to fill in gaps if you are not too clued up on your 18th century history!
An excellent series that I implore you to take a look at! Also worth noting that the Director (Tom Hooper) is now the academy award winning director of The King's Speech [DVD] [2010 ].
5 Stars.