$24.42$24.42
FREE delivery May 22 - 23
Ships from: Pop Catalog Sold by: Pop Catalog
$15.38$15.38
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Great__Buyz
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Wrong Is Right [DVD]
Learn more
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
DVD
October 6, 2015 "Please retry" | DVD-R | 1 | $21.99 | $16.90 |
Watch Instantly with | Rent | Buy |
Purchase options and add-ons
Genre | Action |
Format | Color, NTSC, Letterboxed, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen |
Contributor | Leslie Nielsen, Pax 7 Ink, Katharine Ross, Richard Brooks, Sean Connery, George Grizzard |
Language | English |
Runtime | 1 hour and 57 minutes |
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product Description
Political double-talk, dirty tricks, hidden microphones, spy satellites, bugging the Oval Office and a nuclear bomb for sale are all ingredients in this swift, funny and frightening look at the possibilities in today's political arenas. Sean Connery stars as globe-trotting ace TV news reporter Patrick Hale, who is on the trail of a terrorist offering the sale of a nuclear bomb to a Mid-East oil country. Hale juggles Arab sheiks and international intelligence agents to get at the story. Meanwhile, the President (George Grizzard) tries to convince the public there is no bomb to save his career, while his main opponent in the upcoming election tries to buy the bomb to prove it exists and discredit the President, and General Wombat (Robert Conrad) wants to just bomb the while Middle East.The frenzied plot is hilarious, yet its close parallels to today's front page news add an ominous element of fright.
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.85:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
- Package Dimensions : 7.5 x 5.3 x 0.6 inches; 3.2 ounces
- Director : Richard Brooks
- Media Format : Color, NTSC, Letterboxed, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen
- Run time : 1 hour and 57 minutes
- Release date : March 16, 2004
- Actors : Sean Connery, George Grizzard, Katharine Ross, Leslie Nielsen
- Subtitles: : English, French, Georgian, Japanese
- Producers : Richard Brooks
- Language : English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono)
- Studio : Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
- ASIN : B0001A9I5W
- Number of discs : 1
- Best Sellers Rank: #173,855 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #15,740 in Action & Adventure DVDs
- #18,203 in Comedy (Movies & TV)
- #27,845 in Drama DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This is the case with the rather obscure 1982 film “Wrong is Right” Starring Sean Connery, Katherine Ross, Robert Conrad and host of other journeyman actors of the 1980s, directed by Richard Brooks, who also adapted the screenplay from the novel, “The Better Angels” by Robert McCrary. The film, not in every sense mind you, but in some very familiar ways looks more like the second decade of the 21st century rather than the early 1980s. It isn’t on Netflix or HBO or anywhere else for free but you can buy it on Amazon or youtube if you want to see it.
Laden with just enough campy humor to suggest the story didn’t take itself too seriously, my guess is fast forward thirty years and making that film today, we would be much more serious about it. Of course, Hollywood would never think of it. It has already proven so cowardly that most movies about terrorism the culprit is not Islam but something else, criminal Russians, North Koreans, Castro’s Cubans South American drug lords, or any other criminal enterprise that is not connected with Islam.
The Dr. Strangelove satirical mist flavoring the story, camp style, humorous to a fault dialogue, preachy and insightful all at the same time makes “Wrong is Right” one of the more politically prolific relevant films for our time but not 1982. The movie was not recognized and didn’t do that well in the box office. It kind of came and went as financially failing movies do.
The story centers around a news reporter, Sean Connery, and his contacts with Muslim extremists in the Arab world, namely a fictional nation “Hagreb” and its Allah believing leader which bears striking resemblance to Saudi Arabia and a PLO type group who is looking to procure on the black market two nuclear weapons, or in the vernacular of the day, “atomic bombs.” Suitcase bombs no less, which if you’re old enough to remember were something of a real concern at the time. Never proven it was believed that the Soviets had perfected a nuclear weapon to fit inside a normal size suitcase so it could be carried undetected. But, never mind that it made great fodder for Hollywood movies.
The Bombs first targets are Tel Aviv and Jerusalem but secondary targets are New York, which is where the plot takes us. The whole idea of sneaking a nuclear weapon into a major American city is the sum of all of our worst fears today, but was fantasy then and is played as such in the movie.
One of the striking realizations about this film is that it was made in the early 1980s released in 1982, under a different name in Europe and in the US in 1984. Before 9-11, before the first trade center attack in 1993 before Pam Am 103, before the Achille Lauro, just before the Hezbolllah bombing in Lebanon killing 240 Marines and before Jihad actually became a real threat that we think about on a daily basis. Hollywood fantasy in 1982 has become a reality nightmare in 2016. In the early 80s most Muslim terror was not a concern for those in Paris, France, Fort Hood Texas or San Bernandino, California. In 2016 Jihad has become a household word.
Even the Iraqis who joined in the gloating and celebrating terror against Israel back then and fully sanctioned their leader, Saddam Hussein financially supporting the murder of innocent Jews never thought in their wildest 1001 Arabian night dreams it would reach them. I don’t think they are celebrating any more.
“Wrong is Right” presents a 21st century mentality in a 1980s Reaganesque, cold war world. Futuristic in its approach without really intending for it to be that way.
Its seminal gaze into our future, is eerie when you watch this movie. Suicide bombers, although they just blow themselves up not anyone else. Even for the 1980s that would have been too brutal a display of bloodshed for Americans. After all, it came at a time when President Reagan called the Soviets the evil empire without even a nod to what was going on in Iran, Lebanon, or Libya. We only discovered that afterward.
Part of the charm of this film, even with its prophetic genius, is definitely dated. There are no Arab actors or names in the cast or in the making of this film although half the characters are Muslim. It seems a little strange to be watching Henry Silva, an American actor known for gangster roles and black hatted cowboys playing the Arafat character. Come to think of it maybe that wasn’t such a wrong choice after all. Muslim attitudes toward women are about the same now as they were in the 80s since treatment of women in Islam really hasn’t changed in 1400 years, it’s a little silly to have a blond haired American Christian woman to be a front line officer in the movie’s depiction of the PLO type terror group. But that was Hollywood’s ignorance in 1980.
The ending of the movie is…well you see the movie and comment here of what you think of the ending. I have my opinion but I want to wait to discuss it.
It feels like a bad TV show from the 70s and mocks the viewer to believe a hand-held film camera without sound, can record voices.
I just watched 30 minutes of it, which is 30 minutes off of my life that I will never get back.
Top reviews from other countries
Sean Connery plays a globe-trotting investigative news reporter / camera man who is caught up in a Middle East / CIA conspiracy. He always seems to be at he right place at the right time in order to witness at first hand the next plot twist and to interview the plotters.
Although released in 1982, the presentation appears a little dated even for then, but it explores what was then perceived as the mass-media derived from satelite technology uncovering global conspiracies.
It's centred around Islamic terrorists launching a holy war against the USA, homeland terrorism in the States, the acquisition by the said terrorists of nuclear devices from dodgy arms dealers in order for them to be set off on US soil and their ultimatum threatening their use in order to blackmail the US President and the people.
But there is a twist! Wrong Is Right explores how the media can manipulate and be manipulated in order to influence public opinion polls in the run up to a presidential election. Is everything as it seems? Is the CIA really serving the American president and his people or just themselves. Who is wrong and who is right?
In the light of the Gulf and Afghan wars in the past decade, this film is remarkably precscient and prophetic; so much so as to make one think that it was the inspiration for those events. It will re-ignite all the conspiracy theories that suggest 9/11 was a put-up job in order to provoke a Middle-Eastern war and it will confirm many people's suspicions that a murder can be made to look like death by natural causes.
This has to be one Of Sean Connery's best performances outside the Bond franchise. There is a fine list of mainly American character actors supporting him. The film is firmly tongue-in-cheek whilst not being an outright comedy, but some of the coincidences with the past decade are just jaw-dropping. There is a lot of violence, some of which is quite graphic and in bad taste, so it does surprise me that it's only a 15 rating. Overall, it is very thought-provoking and well worth the purchase if you have never viewed it.
But still worth a watch & is now uncut from the UK earlier edit.