Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Mary, Queen of Scots [VHS]
Additional VHS Tape options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
VHS Tape
April 18, 2000 "Please retry" | — | 1 |
—
| — | $5.00 |
Watch Instantly with | Rent | Buy |
Format | NTSC, Closed-captioned, Color |
Contributor | Katherine Kath, Richard Marden, Trevor Howard, Tom Fleming, John Hale, Christopher Challis, Hal B. Wallis, Daniel Massey, Beth Harris, Nigel Davenport, Charles Jarrott, Patrick McGoohan, Timothy Dalton, Andrew Keir, Vanessa Redgrave, Ian Holm, Glenda Jackson See more |
Language | English |
Runtime | 2 hours and 8 minutes |
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com
As costume dramas go, this is a passionate and feisty one, keyed by the ever-luminous Vanessa Redgrave in the title role and the sharp-edged Glenda Jackson as her jealous cousin, Queen Elizabeth I (who knew a thing or two about palace intrigue). Mary, who was raised in France as a Catholic, claims the Scottish crown from her mother upon her death. But she runs up against religious prejudice, both from the Protestant Elizabeth (who had encountered anti-Protestant bias before she took the throne) and from Mary's Protestant half-brother James Stuart (Patrick McGoohan). Elizabeth, whose own reign is shaky (given a strong Catholic presence in her country), is nervous about her Catholic cousin--and made more so by Mary's seeming inability to appreciate the political niceties of the period. Redgrave received an Oscar nomination for her performance. --Marshall Fine
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- Language : English
- Package Dimensions : 7.32 x 4.19 x 1.12 inches; 6.08 ounces
- Director : Charles Jarrott
- Run time : 2 hours and 8 minutes
- Release date : April 18, 2000
- Date First Available : September 29, 2006
- Actors : Vanessa Redgrave, Glenda Jackson, Patrick McGoohan, Timothy Dalton, Nigel Davenport
- Studio : Universal Studios Home Entertainment
- Producers : Hal B. Wallis
- ASIN : B00004REFE
- Writers : John Hale
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What I want to mention is the outstanding Blu-ray quality of the KL's issue. Such crisp picture quality in BD have I seldom seen, if ever. I viewed 3 films of Redgrave on BD in a row: Isadora, this one, and Camelot, of similar vintage. And this one is astoundingly sharp!
Risking being scorned by wise reviewers, I wish Elisabeth was played by an actress who was beautiful. If her portrait painters did not lie, Elizabeth was no less beautiful than Mary.
Ms. Jackson shone even more brightly in her BBC portrayal of Elizabeth I than she does in this big screen production. She was a brilliant and dynamic actress, now sadly, long forgotten.
This gets only gets 4 stars because the production pales overall by comparison to it's peers of the same era, such as Beckett, A Man For All Seasons and A Lion In Winter, just to name a few.
The characters are wonderfully complicated and generously examined, the writing is artful, and the performances equal to it all. No expense is spared in production, from the rich costume design to the lovingly selected settings nor was any bit of it wasted.
Films such as this will make you ache for what cinema once was.
Unfortunately, even this one is a bit sweet with Mary and goes on hard on Elizabeth.
The players are all first class, starting with a Clash of Titans between Vanessa Redgrave and Glenda Jackson. Two female screen giants fighting out in front of our own eyes. What a feast.
Then come the other giants: Trevor Howard, Ian Holm, Patrick McGoohan, Harry Andrews and many more othe British Screen legends. A real treat in Stardom and a who's who in this movie.
Just for that it is highly recommendable.
Now two points of woe.
First: in all these years (the movie dates back to 1971) do you think that Universal Pictures could have released at least one Widescreen version of it? Noooooh, the Gentlemen went on producing other insignificant stuff, but never cared on re-releasing this one in Letterbox format.
Second: although I liked it when it was released, especially for its cast and more than beautiful music scored by John Barry, why wasn't an attempt made at remaking it in a more true to history perspective?
After all Mary was not as innocent as depicted by Katie Hepburn or even Vanessa Redgrave. This is Folk Lore not History!
Mary was raised in France in exile, but pretty soon took a keen interest in politics and started plotting all by herself to take possession of the English Crown.
These were not the figments of the imagination of Elizabeth, but a hard and harsh reality that the English Crown and the Parliament both took immediately very seriously.
Mary tried it with whomever would have listened to her and would have granted her protection in doing so. She tried to drag the French on her side at first. When this didn't work, she tried the Italians, through the Pope. then came the Spaniards and ultimately the Scots. And they all fell for her.
The reasons for her mad conviction of being the only true Queen of England were inculcated into her by her family due to some contentions they had already back in Henry VIII's Reign.
All this though was certainly not enough to make her the legitimate Queen of England and she should have contented herself by already being Queen of the Scots.
Anyway, she remains a pathetic and sad figure in History and well deserves a movie such as this one as a remainder that at times it is better to be happy with what one already has, rather than wanting the whole pie.
In this instance Mary truly was too immature and too arrogant to admit defeat even if it loomed right in front of her eyes.
And arrogance as we all know, gets so often repaid with a harsh punishment. In her case she lost her head over it.
Some may say that she fought for religion's sake. Is any religion a valid justification for human sacrifice? Especially of other people, rather than your own. Of course not, and yet Mary never hesitated in sending innocent people to be slaughtered in her name.
Some may pity her, some may condemn her, but the fact still remains that she was an intriguing figure wonderfully portrayed by Vanessa Redgrave. And right or wrong, she did exist and should therefore be depicted in at least one movie.
Between Katie Hepburn and Vanessa, I still prefer Vanessa. Glenda Jackson reprises her role Elizabeth R in this one and she's one strong butch of a woman, a hard nut to crack. No wonder that men lost their heads (in more than one way) for her.
Anyway, this one with Elizabeth and Elizabeth R, should be movies to be bought and cherished dearly like good wine. After all it is seldom they make movies like these.
And if you're interested by more Tudor Lore, try also "Henry VIII and his Six Wives", "Anne of the Thousand Days", the filmed Play by Robert Bolt "A Man For All Seasons".
The King is dead, long live the Queen...
Top reviews from other countries
Pero bueno, fuera de eso, todo bien.
Reviewed in Mexico on April 27, 2023
Pero bueno, fuera de eso, todo bien.
This film is about one of my favorite royal women Mary Stuart, Queen of Scotland, who was raised in France as a Catholic, claims the Scottish crown from her mother upon her death. Of course is was after her husband, the King of France had died of an ear infection that spread to his brain, because there wasn't a cure back then...or much of anything. But then she runs up against religious prejudice, both from the Protestant Elizabeth (who had encountered anti-Protestant bias before she took the throne) and from Mary's Protestant half-brother James Stuart. Elizabeth, whose own reign is shaky (given a strong Catholic presence in her country), is nervous about her Catholic cousin--and made more so by Mary's seeming inability to appreciate the political niceties of the period.
In the film, the ever-luminous Vanessa Redgrave (Camelot) takes on the role as Mary, and the sharp-edged Glenda Jackson as Queen Elizabeth, who knew a thing or two about palace intrigue. And Vanessa received an Oscar nomination for her performance. So overall, I would say about this film is that I love it from beginning to end, and I love the original soundtrack in the film, and as I say many times: I love a film with a good soundtrack.
There are a lot of films about Mary Stuart, Queen of Scotland and about her first cousin (once removed), Elizabeth of England. Mary’s paternal grandmother, Margaret, was the older sister of Henry VIII. Her immediate predecessors (King James I to V) had all come to the throne very young and met dramatic ends, dying through assassination, in battle or during sieges. James IV, Margaret’s husband, died at Flodden, when an invading Scottish army was annihilated by the English. James V, king aged 17 months, died aged 30, probably of dysentery, during another war with the English, and Mary succeeded him, aged only 6 days. This background helps to inform the politics we see in this film.
The film was made at a time when the Tudor dynasty was big box office. The BBC had great success with a flagship drama series, about Henry VIII and his 6 wives. They followed that with an even more successful one about his daughter Elizabeth. There were also major book series being written, such as those by Jean Plaidy. John Hale, who wrote an episode of ‘Elizabeth R’ for the BBC, and Glenda Jackson, who won acclaim in the series’ title role, were both plunged back into Tudor machinations and bloodshed, when Hale was engaged to write the screenplay for this film, and Jackson, to reprise her role as the English monarch. Vanessa Redgrave was cast in the film’s title role.
Redgrave and Jackson had both appeared in RSC productions and been directed by the great Peter Hall. They had both already starred in films, Jackson winning an OSCAR for ‘Women in Love’(1970) and a BAFTA for ‘Sunday, Bloody Sunday’(1971). Redgrave had already been nominated for both (an OSCAR twice) and a Golden Globe twice. These were actresses on red-hot form, and now they were given the roles of two of our most interesting and significant female historical figures. Redgrave was duly OSCAR-nominated.
The role of Elizabeth, as played by Jackson, is a full-blooded English lioness, with a mind as sharp as a razor, shrewd, insightful, authoritative, politically astute. Her personal preferences always come second to the needs of her realm. It is a brilliant portrayal, and she is both likeable and admirable. Redgrave’s Mary is a rather paler image, possibly because that is how the film wishes to portray her, but also probably accurate. She is light-hearted, affectionate, but entirely ruled by emotion, and cursed with making immediate judgements and instant decisions. She has virtually no political nous, no instinct for what may be wise, who can be trusted. It also appears (again probably correctly) that Elizabeth was blessed by loyal, clever and supportive courtiers;, Mary lived in a wolf’s lair.
The film provides a fairly clear, and certainly a colourful, picture of the convolutions and complications that made the political map of England and Scotland so fraught at the time. The history is not entirely accurate ~ the Queens never met for example ~ but the flavour is good, and the sets, costumes and visual details are a delight.
This is a richly elaborate and deliciously entertaining 5 Star confection. Ignore the liberties, enjoy the ride.